- Producing Knowledge, Protecting Forests: Rural Encounters with Gender, Ecotourism, and International Aid in the Dominican Republic!
- The Letters of T. S. Eliot, Volume 1: 1898-1922 (Revised Edition).
- Account Options;
- Python Programming Fundamentals (Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science).
- Steve McComas: The Lake Detective;
- Digital Video Quality: Vision Models and Metrics.
- Get this edition;
Capturing these differences by eliciting separate sets of weights for different users is helpful to both decision makers and user groups. The results show why different groups prefer different alternatives and sometimes suggest where compromises that satisfy some of the needs of each group can be found.
Shop with confidence
Attempting to gloss over differences in priorities by eliciting weights from only one or a few perspectives, or by averaging weights across user groups, is unhelpful. Communicating with Stakeholders Assessment and analysis will likely involve more in-depth and potentially, more technical discussions than those occurring during scoping. Experts may be needed to help convey the expected outcomes of different management, project, or policy alternatives on the production of services and the ecosystem service benefits received by various groups.
They can share means-ends diagrams generated by the ecological analysis. These diagrams visually map how alternatives may affect the services identified as important by stakeholders and thus help stakeholders understand those relationships and clearly see where tradeoffs occur. Experts can also be particularly helpful in explaining the ranking, weighting, or prioritizing of values or outcomes.
Loving Your Lake
Information Gathered from Stakeholders Analysts can use the information gained through stakeholder engagement during assessment and analysis to understand how people use and benefit from ecosystem services. With that information, they can refine estimates of changes in the provision of ecosystem services and benefits.
If stakeholder preferences for management, project, or policy alternatives are obtained, analysts can conduct a monetary or non-monetary evaluation to assess the social welfare effects of different alternatives. Both refined estimates of changes in the provision of ecosystem services and benefits and understanding of social welfare effects will add valuable information to the decision process.
Once analysts compile all information pertaining to the decision e. If appropriate, stakeholders may participate in the decision process; however, responsibility for final decisions involving federally managed lands often rests with the administrative federal agency. Information gleaned from stakeholder engagement does not supersede other constraints on the decision process e.
Ultimately, managers will determine the level of priority given to stakeholder preferences for ecosystem services outcomes in the final decision. Managers may be interested in engaging stakeholders or beneficiaries in the decision and implementation process if beneficial opportunities to partner with these parties arise from the assessment of services.
For example, they may realize that external beneficiaries are willing to help support restoration on federal lands if it provides important benefits to their communities. Or perhaps agencies will find opportunities to solve management challenges by partnering with neighboring landowners public or private.
A key element of stakeholder engagement at this stage is communication of the decision process. Managers should clearly indicate what information contributed to the final decision, what did not contribute, and why. An alternatives matrix can be a helpful tool for such communication, but it should be presented alongside additional information about the decision process. In an ecosystem services assessment, stakeholder engagement seeks to identify what people value about an ecosystem and to what extent.
City of Eden Prairie
Sustained engagement provides valuable information about stakeholder preferences for different outcomes. Incorporating information about values and preferences into the decision process may lead to decisions supported by stakeholders. Bright, A. Cordell, A.
Hoover, and M. This Forest Service Technical report provides a framework and guidelines for incorporating human dimension information into forest planning. McLain, R. Poe, K. Biedenweg, L. Cerveny, D. Bessert, and D. This synthesis paper describes several human ecology mapping techniques.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Introduction to Stakeholder Participation. This agency document provides technical guidance on stakeholder engagement. Reed, M. This paper summarizes the development of participatory approaches in environmental management and discusses the potential benefits, limitations, and drawbacks of derived from such participation.
Bureau of Land Management. But it really pays to do some research before you use them. These departments are going to be able to advise you on the options that will work best in your unique situation, and they can also inform you on what kind of approvals you might need. You can certainly maintain your recreational access without removing every plant. There are several types of tools available for removing aquatic plants. The list includes: aerators, bottom blankets, cutters, groomers, lake blowers, pellets, rakes, rollers, skimmers, tillers, and more.
So how do you decide which of these tools, if any, are right for controlling aquatic plants around your dock or pier? If exotic species like Eurasian watermilfoil are present in your lake, they will be nearly impossible to eradicate. So prevention is the first line of defense against invasive species and is the most economical in the long run.
- Data Mining In Finance Advances In Relational And Hybrid Method.
- From Africa to Jamaica: The Making of an Atlantic Slave Society, 1775-1807!
- General Fishing Regulations!
- Lake and Pond Management Guidebook - Steve McComas - Google книги?
- Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Dragon Empires Gazetteer.
- The Politics of Government-Business Relations in Ghana, 1982–2008.
Is there a prevention plan in place for your lake? Mon 16 Sep Tue 17 Sep Wed 18 Sep Thu 19 Sep Fri 20 Sep Sat 21 Sep closed Sun 22 Sep closed More opening hours. Description: p. Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references and index. This guidebook is the "bible" for small-scale lake and pond improvements. It contains over ideas and projects that provide step-by-step practical, low-cost solutions to a wide range of problems that lake management professionals face on a regular basis.
This updated and expanded second edition includes new material on protecting and restoring the shoreland area, practical algae control techniques, enhancing native aquatic plants, historical lake management efforts, and pond management including storm water pond improvements. Dewey: Lake and Pond Management Guidebook. Boca Raton Fla.
Lake and pond management guidebook.