Find out what it means to have faith in Christ. Repentance is a basic LDS Doctrine because it takes action and faith to repent of one's sins. Read about repentance and then see the follow up article with the steps of repentance.
- Related Articles.
- It's time Christians started including Latter-day Saints | Broadview Magazine.
- Trillium 1.
- The Secret Wedding (Mallorens & Friends series Book 9).
- Pharmacology of Hormonal Polypeptides and Proteins: Proceedings of an International Symposium on the Pharmacology of Hormonal Polypeptides, held in Milan, Italy, September 14–16, 1967;
An important LDS Church doctrine is our belief in baptism, who should be baptized and how. Study about baptism in this article, as well as our doctrine on baptism for the dead. Holy Ghost. Learn all about the gospel doctrine of the Holy Ghost. This article explains how one receives this powerful gift in the LDS Church.
How to Pray. Learn how to pray with this basic LDS Church doctrine. This article summarizes the fall of Christ's original church and later restoration in these modern days. The Book of Mormon.
This article details the organizational structure of the LDS Church and how it is the same as the Church Christ organized during His life. Also find out about living prophets, apostles and other LDS Church leaders. Updated by Krista Cook. Share Flipboard Email. For example, the lives of Mormons are likely to remain oriented more by revealed ordinances and covenants whose deep resonances and meaning for life may be praised or evoked in various learned vocabularies, but which are never fully present in any systematic articulation, and thus are not susceptible of representation by a specialized profession of theologians.
Frequently Asked Questions
This speculative suppleness and a certain lightness of doctrinal hierarchy might indeed be the key to a feature of Mormonism that seems to bewilder Fr. Neuhaus: that is, its capacity to adapt modern organizational means to the purposes of a living covenant community. Ralph C. Outside the fanum of true believers, these tales cannot help but appear to be the product of fantasy and fabrication. Trusting that Father Neuhaus is open to truth from whatever source it may come, such a statement can come only from a bias that archaeology offers the only acceptable form of evidence, or from innocent ignorance of the vast amount of reputable scholarship establishing linguistic, cultural, and religious and secular historical evidence that this truly amazing book is indeed the product of ancient writers.
Stengel examines the types of evidence arrayed for and against the theory that ancient Asians and Europeans visited and established foot holds in the Western Hemisphere from b.
Latter Day Saint movement - Wikipedia
The traditionalist argument is summarized in the following line of thought: the wheel and the keystone arch flourished in the Old World before Columbus. The wheel and the keystone arch do not appear in the material record of the New World until after Ergo, there was no contact between the Old World and the New World until after I have heard only slightly less silly arguments against the Book of Mormon. For instance, since the gold plates are not available for examination, Joseph Smith was, ergo, a fraud.
First, Mesopotamians intimately familiar with the wheel and arch had direct contact with Egypt for a thousand years, and yet there is absolutely no archaeological evidence in Egypt in all that time period that the Egyptians knew a thing about the wheel and arch. The evidence for the contact is found elsewhere, in linguistic and cultural similarities, for example. Rejection of these legitimate fields of scholarship reveals an unfortunate bias.
These are largely Mormon scholars who have established a formidable mountain of scholarly evidence that the Book of Mormon is exactly what it purports to be: the translation of a religious record written and compiled by individuals who lived in the Western Hemisphere from b. This evidence cannot be ignored by any serious person who hopes to call himself a scholar, of whatever religious persuasion he may be.
Mormon Christianity: What Other Christians Can Learn from the Latter-day Saints
This is the conclusion of two honest evangelical scholars who, when they began to examine Mormon scholarship, were surprised at the numbers of Mormon scholars, their training, their sophistication, and their intellectual conclusions regarding the historicity of the Book of Mormon.
But, alas, as any convinced Mormon knows, all the evidence in the world for the Book of Mormon will not begin to touch certain individuals, will deeply offend some, and will highly threaten others. Joseph B. I wish that all people could be so reasonable when it comes to religious issues. I am grateful for the many letters received, some of them not for publication, in response to the article on Mormonism. Well, not for all of them. Some were exceedingly uncivil in condemning my incivility in even raising the question of whether Mormonism is Christian.
Call it C. Reflections on a Complicated Question. As I wrote, that dialogue should at present be viewed as interreligious rather than ecumenical i. We should hope so. More disappointing than the dismissive tone of the note on my book, The American Myth of Religious Freedom Briefly Noted, March , is its violent misrepresentation of what the book argues. Smith and City of Boerne v. Even readers less sophisticated than those of First Things will see the severe distinction between these ideas. The notion that your reviewer ascribes to my book cannot be found there.
Why else a novus ordo seclorum? That they might not regard the Catholic Church of our day as an enemy of their version of religious freedom is an indication of the success of their agenda. Unfortunately, your readers do not know that I make a tentative suggestion of a different way to understand religious freedom in the latter part of my book. They go in irreconcilably opposite directions. Your reviewer has apparently not read Fr. Fortin either.
- The Geometric Vein: The Coxeter Festschrift?
- Concepts in Biochemical Pharmacology: Part 2!
- Black and White: From Snapshots to Great Shots;
- Why We’re Afraid of Mormons | BU Today | Boston University;
- Help Your Students Learn About Mormonism | Cold Case Christianity!
- This Rough Magic (Oxford Bookworms Simplified ELT Readers: 1800 Headwords: Level.
- Es war einmal ein Zimmergesell - No. 46 from 49 Deutsche Volkslieder WoO 33;
It is most unfair, however, both to the author and your readers to publish such a wildly tortured summary of the book. You will understand my surprise and disappointment, therefore, that you suspended this requirement in the present case. Your reviewer was not honest. Kenneth R. Craycraft, Jr. As the author of the review in question, I would like to respond to the points Kenneth R. It would have been more accurate to say that he grudgingly acknowledged the scholarship of Brian Tierney and the theoretical labors of Jacques Maritain and John Finnis on this point. When Father Fortin talks about theories of natural rights, he usually means the modern theories associated with Hobbes and Locke, which do have the theoretical and theological problems Dr.
Craycraft enunciates in his book. As for his other complaints, the first two make distinctions irrelevant to the criticism in the review, the third and fourth misread the criticism I criticize Dr. Craycraft for agreeing with Hobbes, Jefferson, et al. One might well argue that the Smith and Boerne decisions read the First Amendment incorrectly, while Dr. Craycraft, and found them wanting. It is not unreasonable to ask that Dr. Craycraft address arguments opposing his own.
The NCAA is a voluntary organization formed by the academy itself to oversee the athletic activities of colleges and universities in the United States, and its rules and enforcement procedures are the result of a consensus of peers. The very point of critics of the norms of ECC is that their formulation and proposed implementation did not come from within the academy but from without. Richard W. And is not the Catholic Church an institution to which the University of Notre Dame is voluntarily related? Allen D. First of all, the believers that Professor Hertzke was meeting with were not representative of the church in China.
It appears from his article that he was meeting with university students and professors and communicating with them in English. But the church the body of believers is largely rural, uneducated, older women for whom questions such as party membership are far removed. Hertzke spoke with is far from representative. At the same time, intellectuals and professionals are grossly underrepresented in the churches of China, and thus in many cases are ignorant of what church life is like in China.
On the other hand, Western mission efforts on university campuses in China have tended to set up their own alternative fellowships outside the local registered or unregistered church structure. Second, Prof. China has long placed social stability at the top of its list of public goods. The emphasis on corporate experience and identity within Chinese culture is a challenge to the Western conception of a civil society based on specifically individual freedoms. As Christians who are citizens of the benevolent dictatorship known as the kingdom of God, surely there are acceptable definitions of what constitutes civil society that might look different from our classical Western definitions.
Latter-day Saints Do Not Accept the Creeds of Post–New Testament Christianity
There is in fact a substantial literature on the question of civil society in China, most of which highlights the enormous progress that has been made in the last decade see, for instance, articles published in the pages of China Quarterly. Rural elections, though often dismissed by American observers as irrelevant to national policy, have nevertheless led to a marked degree of democratization on the local level.
And as any student of China will tell you, the average citizen has much more to do with his local government and much less to do with his national government than we in America. Ironically, Chinese government is experienced as federalist while American government is increasingly experienced as national and monolithic. What Prof. The negative example of Russia is always present in the back of their minds, as is the incredible patience that Chinese history both symbolizes and inculcates.
- Otherworldly and Eschatological Priesthood in the Dead Sea Scrolls;
- Natural English: Reading and Writing Skills Resource Book Intermediate level.
- Are Mormons Christians?.
- Dissipative Structures and Weak Turbulence;
- Mormonism Basics: FAQ;
- Perfect Crimes!
- Sharing Your Faith with Latter-day Saints.
Hertzke accurately recorded what he heard from the Chinese intellectuals he spoke with, but his analysis is shallow and oversimplified. Third, Prof. Hertzke uses American terminology to discuss the status of the church in China, and this leads to inaccuracies. And registration itself is amenable to local situations. In many rural areas, particularly in the North, believers worship in homes or other buildings, and yet for practical, nonpolitical reasons they are not registered. Nor is registration status necessarily a bone of contention within the church.
I recently surveyed pastors and seminary professors in China and found they agreed with what I have witnessed: in Northern China Christian workers make no distinction between registered and unregistered believers in terms of who they serve, teach, baptize, or provide with printed materials. Admittedly, in Southern China conflicts between the registered and unregistered churches are much more common. But these conflicts rarely find their root in government politics.
Likewise, the overseas organizations that support them must find evidence of extensive violent persecution or else they lose their ministry and their fundraising appeal. This pattern is not new to China, nor are these problems foreign to missions around the world. Finally, Prof. Many souls were saved for Christ that night. And the seminaries, like their counterparts in the U.
If the top few seminaries seem worse than the others, it is due only to their increased exchange with the less orthodox side of American seminary life. But the teachers teach what they like. I invite Prof. Hertzke and others associated with First Things to come and visit Western Christians like myself who have been living in China, who speak the language, and who have been worshiping with a particular group of local believers for some years.
Meet the folks in the pews, not just the foreigners who flit in and out like secret agents, muddling in local contexts they do not have the time to understand. This will give a different and far more representative impression of what it means to be a Christian in China today. Andrew T. Thus I welcome the opportunity to learn from, and dialogue with, Andrew T. I will respond to each of his major arguments, but a more general point is in order here.
The rosy picture he paints of religious freedom in China not only contrasts with what I heard, but with a huge documentary record assembled by independent church groups, human rights organizations, and our own State Department. All of those entities report numerous instances in which House Church Protestants and unregistered Catholics have faced exorbitant fines, arrest, and beatings for their faith.
Christian churches have been closed, destroyed, or had their assets confiscated. Buddhist Tibet is a virtual police state; Muslim Xinjiang is approaching that. I wonder if Mr. Kaiser has allowed his optimism to color his general perception. To be sure, wide variation exists in the way authorities treat unregistered churches, and we should applaud those instances in which incipient civil society or local democracy is sprouting. Let me now turn to Mr. First, he argues that I present a distorted picture because the believers I met constituted an educated elite unrepresentative of Chinese Christians.
That is obviously true in some demographic sense, but I wonder how relevant it is in light of the extensive growth of Christianity in China. Here Mr. Kaiser himself seems conflicted. He claims that the Christian church is largely composed of rural, uneducated older women, yet he testifies to the vibrant growth of the church, of many souls saved for Christ. I assume these people are not just older rural women. Second, I did not say that there was a lack of interest among Chinese intellectuals about civil society.
Quite the contrary. I said that there was a tremendous interest in civil society and even in the role that religion might play in its development. What I also said is that the government fears civil society. And on that score the evidence is overwhelming.
Has Mr. Kaiser emerges as an amazing apologist for the Chinese regime. He claims that the Chinese people experience their government as truly federalist, while we in America experience it as national and monolithic. Thus, China is really more democratic than America! Third, Mr.